Marisa Anne Pagnattaro wrote a very good paper: ‘‘‘The Google Challenge’’: Enforcement of Noncompete and Trade Secret Agreements for Employees Working in China’, American Business Law Journal Volume 44, Issue 4, 603–637, Winter 2007.
January 10, 1985, and the Regulations on the Administration of Technology Acquisition Contracts, May 24, 1985, hereinafter Technology Acquisition Regulations Detailed Rules and Regulations for the Implementation of the Regulations on the Administration of Technology Import Contracts, December 30, 1987, are relevant. However, all of these rules and regulations are contract based and, accordingly, are not binding on third parties. Additionally, no legal penalties are specified; the only remedy is for
breach of agreement.
The duration of the noncompete agreement should be limited to the amount that is just enough to protect the employer. “The longer the period, the more evidence you need to prove that the period is reasonable and necessary to protect against unfair competition and not an undue restrain on the employee’s right to work.”
Limit the Scope of the Information covered by the noncompete agreement. “It is advisable that the noncompete clause expressly states that it is designed to preserve business secrets, thereby tying the agreement to a legitimate business reason and undermining any defense that the agreement is an unfair restriction on labor or creates undue hardship on the employee.”
Tailor the geographic scope of the noncompete agreement to protect legitimate business interests.
Provide compensation in exchange for the noncompete agreement.
Limit access to the trade secret information. Files and other places containing trade secrets should be labeled.
Ensure that the information claimed to be a trade secret has economic value and practical applicability realizable utility.
Take active steps to protect the business secret.